M.K. Davis, NO SOUP FOR YOU !!!!!

If you're a blogger and a Bigfoot Researcher, the last two days have been very busy. Yesterday (as you all know) Loren Coleman posted an article at Cryptomundo, that included a letter sent to the Humbolt County District Attorney's Office, penned (or typed) by Cryptozoologist Scott Marlowe.

Whewwww, that was a mouth full.

As you most likely read here and at Cryptomundo, This letter requested a criminal investigation into the "Bigfoot Massacre at Bluff Creek". Mr. Marlowe has taken the "speculation" and "theory" of M.K. Davis and John Johnsen (and lord knows who else) who a whole new level.

This community erupted with more anger than I have seen in a while..

Now, it has escalated to THIS article written by Loren Coleman at Cryptomundo. M.K. Davis has been removed as a speaker at an upcoming conference at the Bigfoot Discovery Center. Apparently Michael Rugg, Curator of the Museum called Mr. Davis on June 6, 2008 to inform him his invitation to speak, has been revoked.

“in light of the ridiculous letter written by Scott Marlowe (as shown on Cryptomundo) I thought it was time our opinion on the matter was made public.” Michael Rugg

"On the 6th of June I called M.K. Davis and rescinded my invitation for him to speak at our [August 2008] event." Michael Rugg

Has anyone ever watched Seinfeld? Do you remember the episode with the "Soup Nazi"? Yeah, that was the first thing I thought of.

Good decision Mr. Rugg. I applaud your forward thinking in this regard, and the assurance this "theory"/"speculation" or whatever, will not be discussed yet again at your Museum. Way to take a stand!!!!!!

This situation is not funny, that I grant you, but it's about time those who hold "positions" within this community stepped up and finally said publicly the things we have only discussed privately. The community seems to be policing itself this time. It's too bad it had to go this far before people finally became outraged and yanked someones soup privileges away.

Now this quote gave me pause,

"he was sorry that others (such as Johnsen) had spread the story so far so fast. (Johnsen subsequently bragged online that he had sold over 120 DVDs as a result of the radio broadcast.)" Michael Rugg

I'm sure he was sorry, just as sorry as he was in 2006.. He blamed John Johnsen then also (along with Henry May).. It never seems to be the fault of M.K. Davis. M.K knew what would happen, and he simply turned a blind eye. What a better way of getting the information out, without having to do it yourself? Then, when the heat gets turned on, you can simply pass the buck and fade into the background.

Does lighting striking the same place twice?

The odds are enormous. But, the odds appear to be in M.K.'s favor.We have all sat as witnesses to the distancing of Mr. Davis from John Johnsen now twice.

Speaking of John Johnsen,

why would Mr. Davis be surprised a businessman such as John Johnsen would not do whatever is necessary to make his business successful?? While I may not agree with John Johnsen on, well, anything.... He is a businessman and, turning a profit for whatever purpose, is how he makes a living.

M.K. knows that, so for him to be even the least bit upset (or surprised) that Mr. Johnsen took this information and ran with it, and not know that he would, is disingenuous.

Come on M.K.

I think this tactic of releasing questionable information to the public, through others, and disappearing when the situation gets too hot for him, has finally blown up in his face, like a pressure cooker.

It was only a matter of time before people said "Enough is Enough".

When Scott Marlowe fired off that letter to the Humbolt County District Attorney - the limit had been reached. But, do not kid yourself folks, M.K. still has his supporters. They are out in full force and attacking anyone who spoke out publicly against M.K. and this "Bigfoot Massacre" theory, speculation, what-the-heck-ever. I wonder if the "Davis" supporters would be as "supportive" if the request for a criminal investigation had their names attached, instead of Bob Gimlins? Yeah, most likely not. It's always ok when it's someone else..

Well it's not, and I will not apologize for my strong defense of Mr. Gimlin, or anyone else, who may in the future have such things said about them. Right is right, and this is not!!! If you feel it is your god given right to make these kinds of claims about people, then you better be prepared to defend yourself with the information that proves your right.. Or be ready for the impending fall out that will inevitably happen.

And, now that Scott Marlowe has realized he sent that letter to the wrong District Attorney, he states he will be making the necessary change and mailing to the correct authorities.

This is not over. Question is, when will the next shoe drop?